W1_Andi_Tuckman Assessment

1. Problem Definition

Work in a group or organization will initiate several problems which are mostly generated from personal perspective, strong leadership profile is utmost required to elaborate and blend all point of views. Kristal AACE 2014 Class members are ordered to assess leadership during face to face class phase 1.

2. Identify the Feasible Alternative

There are four stages of team development introduced by Professor Bruce Tuckman in 1970 present in the following figure:


Figure 1. Tuckman’s Method

Tuckman’s Assessment Method will be used as particular method which can be implemented to define “Where are we now” in term of Development Stage. From the above figure, it is explaining the evolution of each member forming development that will initiate some different perspective in storming stage and later build the agreement after sometimes (norming stage). Final stage of this process will be performing, when each individual reach the same vision and perform collaboration together for group goals.

3. Development of the Outcome for Alternative

Kristal AACE 2014 team members shall choose and fill 32 questions survey which are developed by Donald Clark. The answer will be collected and will lead score system which is determined what figure we are now.

There are four stages we have to pass:


Leadership style: dominant due to unclear role and responsibility.


Leadership style: Tolerable due to many conflicts among team members.


Leadership style: respectful since team members start to resolve their differences.


Leadership style: concentrate on team development due to performed environment.

4. Selection Criteria

A resume after 32 questions has been answered with additional Delphi Technique Tool using P70 probability confident level as shown as below table.

Lead Survey

Figure 2. Donald Clark Team Survey Result

Lead Delphi

Figure 3. P70 Result with Delphi Technique

It shows result, currently Kristal AACE 2014 project stage is PERFORMING.

 5. Analysis and Comparison of the Alternative

The team reaches the performing stage when hard work leads, without friction, to the achievement of the team’s goal. The structures and processes that we have set up support this well. A leader can delegate much of his work, and concentrate on developing team members. It feels easy to be part of the team at this stage, and people who join or leave won’t disrupt performance.

6. Selection of the Preferred Alternative

FORMING and NORMING Stage can be appropriate alternatives considered negligible score while comparing to PERFORMING Stage.

7. Performance Monitoring and the Post Evaluation of Result

As the result team achieved, team has to maintain collaboration prior to achieving best performance in order not to fall into former stage which is NORMING. Leadership factor is the most taking effect on the team environment, indeed monitoring process is strongly recommended to be conducted in periodical time.


  1. Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing – Understanding the Stages of Team Formation. Retrieved from  (http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_86.htm)
  2. Charity, Ron. Share Point and Group Dynamis – Bruce Tuckmans Theory. Retrieved from  (http://ronjcharity.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/sharepoint-and-group-dynamics-bruce-tuckmans-theory/)
  3. Survey: What Stage is Your Team in? Retrieved from  (http://www.cscaweb.org/EMS/sector_team/support_files/tools_for_the_team/tool_stage.pdf)
  4. W1_APE_Tuckman Analysis Assignment. Retrieved from (http://simatupangaace2014.wordpress.com/2013/09/03/w1_ape_tuckman-analysis-assignment/)

2 thoughts on “W1_Andi_Tuckman Assessment

  1. Nice work, Pak Andi!!! You followed our 7 step process perfectly, although it would have been better if you had set a more specific time to do the follow up analysis. Usually around W7 to W9.

    But still very well done for your first blog posting.

    You also did very well on your citations.

    Keep up the good work and as a “Leader by Example” I will be watching to see how well you can mentor your colleagues on the team so they too can be as successful as you have been.

    Dr. PDG, Singapore

  2. Pingback: W1_MFO_Tuckman Analysis Assignment – EMERALD AACE 2017 – WEEKLY BLOG

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s